Diskussion:Klasse 9: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
| (13 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 5 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 12: | Zeile 12: | ||
{{Merke-M|'''Unterschreibt jeden Beitrag''', damit man den Autor kennt. Das geht mit folgender Zeichenfolge: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> und sieht dann so aus: [[Benutzer:RoemleinJh|RoemleinJh]] 23:45, 14. Mär. 2012 (CET).}} | {{Merke-M|'''Unterschreibt jeden Beitrag''', damit man den Autor kennt. Das geht mit folgender Zeichenfolge: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> und sieht dann so aus: [[Benutzer:RoemleinJh|RoemleinJh]] 23:45, 14. Mär. 2012 (CET).}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Suggestions for possible discussion topics:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1) You have written exclusively positive film reviews. "Rabbit-Proof Fence", however, was discussed rather controversially after its release in 2002. What might have triggered the negative responses of some critics? Was there anything you didn't like about the film? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) Of course, the film reviews published on our school wiki are very well-written texts. But remember: every text can be revised several times - so let's bring them to perfection! :-) any ideas/suggestions on how we could further improve the style/structure of the texts? Would you like to add further aspects? But keep in mind that before changing the original text, you have to discuss your proposal here in the forum! | ||
| + | |||
| + | == You forgot the class == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now nobody knows who you are | ||
| + | : We are from class 9c | ||
| + | : [[Benutzer:PantleMi|PantleMi]] 15:27, 1. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | :: thanks for your remark, Matti; but the school wiki is organized in a more general way ("class 5-12", not "5a", "9c" etc.), so that everyone consulting the page understands quickly where he/she can find texts about the topics dealt with in class 9 (for example). [[Benutzer:RoemleinJh|RoemleinJh]] 17:18, 4. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | :::I think it was just because Anna and Robin did wrote class 9c behind their name and Janina didn't.... [[Benutzer:SchimmackHh|SchimmackHh]] 21:25, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == A few mistakes in the text... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | To Janina's Text: I just corrected a few mistakes in the text, like a missing space between words and a missing word. It is a very good text, good job Janina! :D | ||
| + | : [[Benutzer:PantleMi|PantleMi]] 15:27, 1. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == well done == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think our class mates did a good job, and I enjoy reading the text. @PantleMi: thank you for correcting the texts. | ||
| + | In my opinion those texts are easy to read and not boring, so: well done :) | ||
| + | [[Benutzer:KettelerAa|KettelerAa]] 18:45, 3. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Film reviews: titles == | ||
| + | |||
| + | What do you think about giving your reviews more catchy titles? I personally believe that a real title would look nicer in the table of contents than just "this film review was written by...."/"film review by..." - any ideas/suggestions for possible titles? | ||
| + | [[Benutzer:RoemleinJh|RoemleinJh]] 22:16, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Lead-in sentences == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think your lead-in sentence is very nice Janina :) | ||
| + | Maybe Robin could use more adjectives, but all in all you three guys have done a very good job! :) | ||
| + | [[Benutzer:TremmelHa|TremmelHa]] 23:16, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think the reviews are really good, there are lots of adjectives, which make the texts more interesting. | ||
| + | I'm not sure, but I think in Robins lead-in sentence, there is no verb. Could someone check this, so we can change it, | ||
| + | if I am right. | ||
| + | [[Benutzer:SchauerJa2|SchauerJa2]] 11:43, 16. Feb. 2013 (CET) | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 16. Februar 2013, 11:43 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Tipps zur Arbeit auf Diskussionsseiten
In den Kursen werden auch Diskussionen durchgeführt. Dazu dienen die Reiter "Diskussion" oben auf jeder Seite. Regeln dazu und wie man am besten Beiträge und Antworten schreibt, findet Ihr in der Hilfe: Diskussion. Eigene Meinungen kann man mit einer Vorlage hervorheben.
Wichtig sind folgende Punkte:
- Wie erstellt man einen neuen Beitrag?
- Wie antwortet man auf einen Beitrag?
- Wohin schreibt man einen neuen Beitrag?
- Darf man in den Beiträgen Anderer etwas korrigieren?
|
Merke:
Unterschreibt jeden Beitrag, damit man den Autor kennt. Das geht mit folgender Zeichenfolge: ~~~~ und sieht dann so aus: RoemleinJh 23:45, 14. Mär. 2012 (CET). |
Suggestions for possible discussion topics:
1) You have written exclusively positive film reviews. "Rabbit-Proof Fence", however, was discussed rather controversially after its release in 2002. What might have triggered the negative responses of some critics? Was there anything you didn't like about the film?
2) Of course, the film reviews published on our school wiki are very well-written texts. But remember: every text can be revised several times - so let's bring them to perfection! :-) any ideas/suggestions on how we could further improve the style/structure of the texts? Would you like to add further aspects? But keep in mind that before changing the original text, you have to discuss your proposal here in the forum!
You forgot the class
Now nobody knows who you are
- We are from class 9c
- PantleMi 15:27, 1. Feb. 2013 (CET)
- thanks for your remark, Matti; but the school wiki is organized in a more general way ("class 5-12", not "5a", "9c" etc.), so that everyone consulting the page understands quickly where he/she can find texts about the topics dealt with in class 9 (for example). RoemleinJh 17:18, 4. Feb. 2013 (CET)
- I think it was just because Anna and Robin did wrote class 9c behind their name and Janina didn't.... SchimmackHh 21:25, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET)
- thanks for your remark, Matti; but the school wiki is organized in a more general way ("class 5-12", not "5a", "9c" etc.), so that everyone consulting the page understands quickly where he/she can find texts about the topics dealt with in class 9 (for example). RoemleinJh 17:18, 4. Feb. 2013 (CET)
A few mistakes in the text...
To Janina's Text: I just corrected a few mistakes in the text, like a missing space between words and a missing word. It is a very good text, good job Janina! :D
- PantleMi 15:27, 1. Feb. 2013 (CET)
well done
I think our class mates did a good job, and I enjoy reading the text. @PantleMi: thank you for correcting the texts. In my opinion those texts are easy to read and not boring, so: well done :) KettelerAa 18:45, 3. Feb. 2013 (CET)
Film reviews: titles
What do you think about giving your reviews more catchy titles? I personally believe that a real title would look nicer in the table of contents than just "this film review was written by...."/"film review by..." - any ideas/suggestions for possible titles? RoemleinJh 22:16, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET)
Lead-in sentences
I think your lead-in sentence is very nice Janina :) Maybe Robin could use more adjectives, but all in all you three guys have done a very good job! :) TremmelHa 23:16, 5. Feb. 2013 (CET)
I think the reviews are really good, there are lots of adjectives, which make the texts more interesting. I'm not sure, but I think in Robins lead-in sentence, there is no verb. Could someone check this, so we can change it, if I am right. SchauerJa2 11:43, 16. Feb. 2013 (CET)
